Denegri case: after the hearing in the Court the argument of the right to be forgotten is diluted
After the questions of the judges of the highest court, there were several doubts about the claim of the model and producer
Right to be forgotten: After a tense hearing, the Court enters the stage of definitions in Natalia Denegri's lawsuit against Google
The judges questioned the parties' lawyers. The magistrates' doubts were aimed at determining how the internet giant values content and makes it available to users. “I was a minor, I was vulnerable, I happened horrible things,” said the journalist who claims that her name on networks is not associated with the Coppola scandal
Right to be forgotten: the reasons why it could not be applied to the Natalia Denegri case
What are the differences with other claims where this criterion was used to remove links from search engines. The mistake of choosing this “leading case”
Right to be forgotten: Google warned about information restriction and freedom of expression
The Supreme Court requested a public hearing to deal with the case brought by Natalia Denegri. The search engine assumes that the ruling “discloses free will and prohibits access to public legal materials.”
Right to be forgotten: Google warned about information restriction and freedom of expression
The Supreme Court requested a public hearing to deal with the case brought by Natalia Denegri. The search engine assumes that the ruling “discloses free will and prohibits access to public legal materials.”
Right to be forgotten: Google warned about information restriction and freedom of expression
The Supreme Court requested a public hearing to deal with the case brought by Natalia Denegri. The search engine assumes that the ruling “discloses free will and prohibits access to public legal materials.”
Right to be forgotten: Google warned about information restriction and freedom of expression
The Supreme Court requested a public hearing to deal with the case brought by Natalia Denegri. The search engine assumes that the ruling “discloses free will and prohibits access to public legal materials.”
Right to be forgotten: Google warned about information restrictions and freedom of expression
The Supreme Court convened a public hearing to deal with the case brought by Natalia Denegri. The search engine assumes that the ruling “discloses free will and prohibits access to materials of a legal nature belonging to the public person.”
Right to be forgotten: Google warned about information restrictions and freedom of expression
The Supreme Court convened a public hearing to deal with the case brought by Natalia Denegri. The search engine assumes that the ruling “discloses free will and prohibits access to materials of a legal nature belonging to the public person.”
Right to be forgotten: Google warned about information restriction and freedom of expression
The Supreme Court requested a public hearing to deal with the case brought by Natalia Denegri. The search engine assumes that the ruling “discloses free will and prohibits access to public legal materials.”
Últimas Noticias
Ganadería argentina: un año bisagra: buenos precios y viejas deudas estructurales
Con exportaciones que crecen en valor pese a caer en volumen, una prórroga clave de la Unión Europea en materia ambiental y precios firmes para el productor, la cadena de la carne atraviesa un momento de contrastes
Plan Michoacán incorpora nuevas medidas para garantizar derechos laborales: acciones iniciarán en el sector aguacatero
La secretaría de Agricultura dio a conocer el Certificado Laboral de Agroexportación del “oro verde”
Resultados del Gana Diario de este martes 16 de diciembre de 2025: todos los números ganadores del último sorteo
¿Se rompió el pozo millonario este martes? Revise si fue el afortunado ganador del premio mayor
Quién es el participante de MasterChef Celebrity que Maxi López quiso presentarle a Zaira Nara: “Está loco”
El exfutbolista no perdió oportunidad para bromear y revelar su intento por convertirse en celestino, generando risas y complicidad con su inesperada propuesta romántica
El Gobierno de Castilla y León se gasta 228.000 euros para que las ranas puedan entrar y salir de abrevaderos, pero no encuentra empresa que por otros 332.000 euros revitalice charcas para anfibios
El proyecto ha levantado ciertas críticas en redes sociales, donde se denuncia un gasto impropio para que “las ranas puedan beber”. Las actuaciones en 350 abrevaderos son más amplias: “mejorar el hábitat de diferentes especies de anfibios”
